From: Mikulas Patocka <[email-masked]>

We need to check if the exception was completed after dropping the lock.

After regaining the lock, __find_pending_exception checks if the exception
was already placed into &s->pending hash.

But we don't check if the exception was already completed and placed into
&s->complete hash. If the process waiting in alloc_pending_exception was
delayed at this point because of a scheduling latency and the exception
was meanwhile completed, we'd miss that and allocate another pending
exception for already completed chunk.

It would lead to a situation where two records for the same chunk exist
and potential data corruption because multiple snapshot I/Os to the
affected chunk could be redirected to different locations in the
snapshot.

Cc: [email-masked]
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email-masked]>
Signed-off-by: Alasdair G Kergon <[email-masked]>

---
 drivers/md/dm-snap.c |   13 +++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6.29/drivers/md/dm-snap.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.29.orig/drivers/md/dm-snap.c	2009-04-02 16:45:16.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6.29/drivers/md/dm-snap.c	2009-04-02 16:45:19.000000000 +0100
@@ -1080,6 +1080,13 @@ static int snapshot_map(struct dm_target
 				goto out_unlock;
 			}
 
+			e = lookup_exception(&s->complete, chunk);
+			if (e) {
+				free_pending_exception(pe);
+				remap_exception(s, e, bio, chunk);
+				goto out_unlock;
+			}
+
 			pe = __find_pending_exception(s, pe, chunk);
 			if (!pe) {
 				__invalidate_snapshot(s, -ENOMEM);
@@ -1226,6 +1233,12 @@ static int __origin_write(struct list_he
 				goto next_snapshot;
 			}
 
+			e = lookup_exception(&snap->complete, chunk);
+			if (e) {
+				free_pending_exception(pe);
+				goto next_snapshot;
+			}
+
 			pe = __find_pending_exception(snap, pe, chunk);
 			if (!pe) {
 				__invalidate_snapshot(snap, -ENOMEM);